Archive - May 2005

Date
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31

Why?

Many people ask me, "What do you get from advocating open source?"

It's funny what people will think when they see people doing stuff, but not for money. They cannot fathom someone doing something just because he or she can, because he or she likes it. But no, that is not my answer.  read more »

What's in a Name?

I'm back from a few days' hiatus and I to commemorate this I have decided to make some small changes to the masthead in order to be more 'politically correct'... Yes, that was a bad pun...

The information soldier will be right back after these messages...

Are You Sure Who's Got Your Back?

Check this then this.

Now let's get into the proper perspective; Reuters is a news agency company. It wouldn't surprise anyone if I said that such a company depends on the timely flow of information. As such, getting their messaging system down might represent thousands of dollars worth of lost revenue. Or, in Reuters own words:

"... the ability to communicate efficiently with your customers and colleagues is more important than ever. Now, Reuters brings instant messaging to the global financial community, providing a seamless flow of information between you and your customers, businesses partners and employees. That means information gets to the right people at the right time..."

And they continue on to say:

"Reuters Messaging is a secure, high-performance instant messaging service for the financial industry. ...

Reuters Messaging is an 'industrial-strength' application providing high levels of security and encryption. ..."

It's so funny, it... It isn't, actually. Now I wonder, will Microsoft restitute Reuters of revenue lost whilst their system was down?

The information soldier knows mercenaries' and pirates' loyalties are to the almighty buck...